« The Chinese Collective Nuclear Guilty ConsciousnessWho done Bhindranwale? »

Mass murders for a Peoples Car

09/02/08

Permalink 11:00:01 pm, by Brain Dead Email , 618 words   English (US)
Categories: India

Mass murders for a Peoples Car

It is heartening to read this headline

It’s official: Tatas set to bid Singur goodbye

It reads

''This decision was taken in order to ensure the safety of its employees and contract labour, who have continued to be violently obstructed from reporting to work,"

Here is the fundemantal question. JRD TATA set up a steel plant defying the impearlilist. It created a movement for Indians. Today the clock has turned anti-clock, TATA killed Indians joining hands with communist for its Nano Car.

Hunger

...a village of farm workers most of whose 90 families lost their livelihood after the fields they worked in were acquired for the Tata Motors project.

Rape and Murder:

Suhrid Baran Dutta, CPI(M)'s zonal committee secretary from Singur arrested for his suspected role in the murder of a woman opposing land acquisition for the Tata Motors' car plant at Singur in West Bengal, Thursday refused to undergo a lie detector test in a Delhi court.

Tapasi was in the movement launched by the Trinamool Congress against the acquisition of farmland for the Tata project. Her charred body was found Dec 18. She was also allegedly raped before being killed.

This is just a glimpse.

Turning Agricultural land into Industrial land

The statistics cited earlier in this dispatch quoting state government sources, the fact that the whole Singur block has an average crop density of 220% and the fact that the proposed Tata Motors site is most well irrigated and the most fertile in the block and scores of photographs and video clippings in the print and electronic media showing the fields of the area nails her lies.

Did TATA not know all this?

On that afternoon, the Chief Minister Mr. Buddhadeb Bhattacharyee, sitting alongside Mr Ratan Tata, the chief of a dominant Indian capitalist group - the TATA’s, announced in a press conference that Tata Motors had made an agreement with the state government to set up a factory for small cars at Singur. In the press conference it was also made public that the state government would hand over 1000 acres of land in Singur. It cleverly remained silent on whether any Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) had been signed.

Why Singur?

This is the Singur that the Government chose for Tata’s small car project, About 27% of the five mouzas (out of 16) of the Block has been finally selected ‘acquired’ and fenced off with a massive police action for the purpose. The process of selection of the site is quite unprecedented and queer. From the statements of the Chief Minister, only this much could be ascertained that the Tatas opted for it and the government accepted readily. Even as late as on 26 December, the CM was reported to have said that the government had no option but to accept Tatas’ proposal.

Here is a tale told by the Singur BDO in presence of the local Panchayet boss Ranjt Mandal recorded on 15 June--Singur is a 40 minutes’ drive from the airport along the newly built Expressway via the new Vivekananda Setu under construction. So the Tatas or their top brass flying from other metros will have to waste little time to reach their destination.

Didn't Ma tell not to keep wrong company?

A senior Tata Group official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the company has left it to the state government to resolve its differences with all such farmers who are protesting against “forceful” acquisition of land for the Nano project.

What has become of TATA group? It cares only about its employees? What about the poor people? Why does it has to resort to such practices? This is not what JRD TATA built. I am sure he must be turning in his grave.

5 comments

Comment from: K M Kurup [Visitor]
Why blame the TATA group? As a business entity they only propose the setting up ofa n auto industry in the state, it is up to the state govt. to allocate land after taking into consideration how it might affect the people, environment, etc?

Communist governments the world over are known for their lack of social justice and the blatant disregard of the masses. So, it is no wonder, murder, rape and pillage has been orchestrated by the State communist government.
09/11/08 @ 03:23
Comment from: Brain Dead [Member] Email
TATA like all people with common sense know that West Bengal is a bad place to set up stuff. They still did it. There were land available in rest of the country.

Why was West Bengal, so far off from the real markets in western, Northern and Southern India, chosen for the project?

Why did not TATA protest at the first news of deaths and rape?

TATA continued to build its factory even when the inhuman repression and untold misery was thrust on the villagers.

It is TATA which is responsible fr the mess. it goes against the principles what JRD set out to achieve.
09/11/08 @ 04:04
Comment from: K M Kurup [Visitor]
As I mentioned business entities go wherever the business climate is favourable to their undertaking.

West Bengal might have been chosen because it has the necessary economic factors conducive for an industry - human resources, infrastructure, logistics, port facilities and of course land.

The proposal of a particular area such as Singgur was the state's option. Any industry wishing to set up its plant does not have the luxury of choosing its site. It is dependentant on how and where a state wants its industrial development.

The unpleasant fracas that happened in the state is the machinations of the political set up of the state where losers tend to resort to violence to impede progress.

TATA can just accept whatever loss incurred and take its business elsewhere.West Bengal is not the only state available. Even Sri Lanka has recognized the potential and has offered whatever TATA needs.
09/12/08 @ 21:13
Comment from: Brain Dead [Member] Email
Thanks for the continued response.

By the parameters like human resources, infrastructure, logistics, port facilities and of course land, Maharashtra is the best place besides being closer to the buyers.

The fracas and unpleasant words you are using is very mild. What happened in Singur is much more than that.

The state is famous for machinations.

It is not that what you say are fundamentally wrong. What you mentioned is perfectly right as per the book.

But did the TATA's followed it?

If your answer is "its TATA and what they do is always right,", then I am afraid to say that is not true.

Its a common knowledge that West Bengal is wrong place to do business. See, http://blogs.frontierindia.net/index.php/what-others-say/2008/09/11/militant-trade-union-promoters-meet-mili

everybody is finding it out now.

09/12/08 @ 23:23
Comment from: Dipack Hattengdi [Visitor]
Blaming the Tata's is irrational. However, it is interesting to note that a Tata auto mfg plant in W.B. would be a direct threat to the erstwhile monopolist (local) Hindustan Motors. Further, the communist's behaviour in 1962, while it was condoned by the then congress Government, was in the context and circumstances, certainly traitorous. Even traditional communist countries are nationalists first and politburos/cominterns etc much later, unlike our Indian communists. What did you expect?
11/15/08 @ 12:59

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
November 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 << <   > >>
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Search

XML Feeds

powered by free blog software